Bibliography

@article{morton_evans-pritchard_2007,

title = {Evans-Pritchard and Malinowski: The Roots of a Complex Relationship},

author = {Christopher Morton},

url = {https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol34/iss2/4},

issn = {0362-9074},

year  = {2007},

date = {2007-01-01},

journal = {History of Anthropology Newsletter},

volume = {34},

number = {2},

pages = {10--14},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{souza_por_2006,

title = {Por uma educação antropológica: comparando as idéias de Bronislaw Malinowski e Paulo Freire},

author = {Mauricio Rodrigues de Souza},

doi = {10.1590/S1413-24782006000300009},

issn = {1413-2478},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {Revista Brasileira de Educação},

volume = {11},

number = {33},

pages = {487--496},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{kuklick_humanity_2006,

title = {‘Humanity in the chrysalis stage’: indigenous Australians in the anthropological imagination, 1899–1926},

author = {Henrika Kuklick},

doi = {10.1017/S0007087406008405},

issn = {1474-001X, 0007-0874},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {The British Journal for the History of Science},

volume = {39},

number = {4},

pages = {535--568},

abstract = {Baldwin Spencer and F. J. Gillen's Native Tribes of Central Australia (1899) is now remembered as an approximation of the anthropological method that would soon be conventional: a comprehensive study of a delimited area, based on sustained fieldwork, portraying a population's distinctive character. In 1913, however, Bronislaw Malinowski said of Spencer and Gillen's studies that ‘half the total production in anthropological theory ha[d] been based upon their work, and nine-tenths affected or modified by it’. Native Tribes inspired an intense international debate, orchestrated by J. G. Frazer, broker of the book's publication, predicated on the assumption that indigenous Australians were the most primitive of living peoples, whose totemism was somehow at the base of civilization's highest achievements – monogamous marriage and truly spiritual religion. But the debate proved irresolvable in Frazer's terms. Pondering conflicting interpretations of totemism, anthropologists rejected unilinear models of social evolution like Frazer's. Nationally differentiated populations of professional anthropologists emerged in the early twentieth century, developing distinctive theoretical schemes. Nevertheless, some issues central to the debate remained vital. For example, how were magical, scientific and religious modes of thought and action to be distinguished? And in Australia, analyses of indigenes were distinctively construed. White settlers, concerned to legitimate colonial rule, asked specific questions: did Aborigines have established ties to specific lands? Were Aborigines capable of civilization? Biogeographical theory underpinned Spencer's relatively liberal conclusions, which had precursors and successors in Australian anthropology: Aborigines had defined criteria of land ownership, their habits were suitable adaptations to their circumstances, and observed cultural diversity among Aborigines denoted their ‘nascent possibilities of development along many varied lines’.},

keywords = {Australia, history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{obrebski_bronislaw_2004,

title = {Bronislaw Malinowski's Functional Method},

author = {Joseph Obrebski},

url = {https://www.infona.pl//resource/bwmeta1.element.df6fc746-430a-3dfe-8865-1cd8a0935740},

issn = {0039-3371},

year  = {2004},

date = {2004-01-01},

urldate = {2018-09-07},

journal = {Studia Socjologiczne},

volume = {2(173)},

pages = {35--64},

abstract = {Józef Obrebski's article entitled 'Bronislaw Malinowski's Functional Method of Analysis' preserved in his archives in manuscript form. was edited by Anna Engelking. This elaborate work concerning the method of analysis of Obrebski's professor and mentor presents Malinowski's functionalism in the context of both his own scholarly biography as well contemporary anthropology. The article is accompanied by discussion by Kotarbinski and Ossowski, and the author's own response to it. The remaining archival texts by Obrebski are included in the Annex. These are fragments of two lost or unfinished larger works regarding Malinowski from the late 1930's. The first edition of these yet unknown archival works and the evidence of the first studies of Malinowski's legacy becomes an interesting contribution to the history of Polish ethnology and sociology.},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{stone_nazism_2003,

title = {Nazism as modern magic: bronislaw malinowski's political anthropology},

author = {Dan Stone},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/0275720032000143356},

doi = {10.1080/0275720032000143356},

issn = {0275-7206},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-09-01},

journal = {History and Anthropology},

volume = {14},

number = {3},

pages = {203--218},

abstract = {In the 1930s, the functionalist anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski embarked on a lecture tour of the United States in an attempt to alert the American public to the threat posed by Nazism. This article considers how Malinowski's public campaigning built on his anthropological studies, and suggests how the insights contained therein can still be an impetus to further augment our understanding of Nazism as a phenomenon.},

keywords = {history, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{cooley_theorizing_2003,

title = {Theorizing Fieldwork Impact: Malinowski, Peasant-Love and Friendship},

author = {Timothy J Cooley},

doi = {10.2307/30036866},

issn = {0968-1221},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-01-01},

journal = {British Journal of Ethnomusicology},

volume = {12},

number = {1},

pages = {1--17},

abstract = {In this introductory essay I toggle between my own fieldwork experiences and the historical legacies that I encounter in the field, especially that of Malinowski, who in his youth was a frequent visitor to the Polish mountain region that I study nearly a century later. I propose that Malinowski was influenced by a Slavic "peasant-love" model of ethnography that shares much with the more current "friendship" model. Though I believe friendship model field-work is unsurpassed, its relationship to peasant-love fieldwork causes me to wonder if it too is motivated by ideologies that will be judged harshly by our intellectual descendants.},

keywords = {ethnography, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{pulman_malinowski_2003,

title = {Malinowski et la liberté sexuelle des Trobriandais},

author = {Bertrand Pulman},

doi = {10.4000/lhomme.216},

issn = {0439-4216},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {L’Homme. Revue française d’anthropologie},

number = {166},

pages = {7--30},

abstract = {Les considérations relatives à la vie sexuelle occupent une place très importante dans les publications de Malinowski sur les Trobriandais. Or, il s’est lui-même trouvé, durant son séjour en Océanie, dans une situation libidinale particulière qui ne fut pas sans interférer avec son travail scientifique. Malinowski affirme notamment, à plusieurs reprises, qu’il régnerait aux Trobriand une très grande liberté en matière de sexualité faisant nettement contraste avec la situation des sociétés occidentales. Pourtant, la documentation publiée par Malinowski lui-même infirme largement cette affirmation. Dès lors, il importe de mesurer combien le travail de Malinowski porte la marque d’un rapport transférentiel non élucidé à ses data.},

keywords = {Trobriands, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{burton_nanook_2002,

title = {Nanook and the Kirwinians: Deception, Authenticity, and the Birth of Modern Ethnographic Representation},

author = {John W Burton and Caitlin W Thompson},

doi = {10.2307/3815582},

issn = {0892-2160},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-01-01},

journal = {Film History},

volume = {14},

number = {1},

pages = {74--86},

keywords = {ethnography, Melanesia, Trobriands, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{pulman_malinowski_2002,

title = {Malinowski et l'ignorance de la paternité},

author = {Bertrand Pulman},

doi = {10.2307/3322882},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-12},

journal = {Revue française de sociologie},

volume = {43},

number = {4},

pages = {739--763},

abstract = {Bertrand Pulman : Malinowski und die Ignorierung der Vaterschaft. Die Wissenschaftsarbeit von Bronislaw Malinowski begann mehrere Jahre vor seiner ethnographischen Untersuchung auf den Trobriand-Inseln im ersten Weltkrieg. Wir möchten hier zeigen wie wichtig sein erste Werk},

keywords = {kinship, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{keck_les_2002,

title = {Les théories de la magie dans les traditions anthropologiques anglaise et française},

author = {Frédéric Keck},

doi = {10.4000/methodos.90},

issn = {1769-7379},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {Methodos. Savoirs et textes},

number = {2},

abstract = {Cet article oppose les traditions anthropologiques française et anglaise sur leur traitement du problème de la magie, en particulier sur les deux questions que pose le phénomène de la magie : quel type de rationalité donne à la magie son efficacité alors qu’elle ne fournit aucune prévision ? Comment passe-t-on de la rationalité magique à une rationalité critique et scientifique ? Après un rappel des rapports entre magie, religion et science tels qu’il sont conçus par Tylor et Frazer, on oppose l’idée d’une plasticité des énoncés magiques en fonction des contextes pragmatiques où ils s’inscrivent, chez Malinowski et Evans-Pritchard, et l’idée d’une structure de la pensée magique qui viendrait prendre corps dans les actes de l’individu magicien, chez Mauss et Lévi-Strauss. On conclut alors sur la façon dont ces deux traditions abordent le problème d’une logique de la pratique, et sur les conséquences qu’une telle différence dans la position des problèmes peut avoir aujourd’hui.},

keywords = {history of anthropology, magic and religion, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{hirsch_malinowskis_2002,

title = {Malinowski's Intellectual Property},

author = {Eric Hirsch},

doi = {10.2307/3694955},

issn = {0268-540X},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-01-01},

journal = {Anthropology Today},

volume = {18},

number = {2},

pages = {1--2},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{roldan_writing_2002,

title = {Writing ethnography. Malinowski's fieldnotes on Baloma},

author = {Arturo Alvarez Roldán},

doi = {10.1111/j.1469-8676.2002.tb00065.x},

issn = {1469-8676},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-01-01},

journal = {Social Anthropology},

volume = {10},

number = {3},

pages = {377--393},

keywords = {ethnography, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{weber_mission_2001,

title = {Mission Strategies, Anthropologists, and the Harmon Foundation's African Film Projects: Presenting Africa to the Public the Inter-War Years, 1920–1940},

author = {Charles W Weber},

doi = {10.1177/009182960102900207},

issn = {0091-8296},

year  = {2001},

date = {2001-01-01},

journal = {Missiology},

volume = {29},

number = {2},

pages = {201--223},

abstract = {After World War I there was an international cooperative effort among mission leaders, such as J. H. Oldham and Emory Ross, and African anthropologists, such as Bronislaw Malinowski and Diedrich Westermann to cooperate in the study and understanding of Africa. This was accomplished through books; the activities of the International Institute of African Languages and Cultures and its journal, Africa; and articles in The International Review of Missions, all of which promoted a functionalist approach. Efforts at translating this theory and conveying its ideas to the popular level in order to inform the public and to modify the “Tarzan” stereotypes were the two African film projects sponsored by the American-based Harmon Foundation. These projects produced a series of films intended to portray a more accurate view of Africa to schools, churches, and civic organizations. This article shows the linkages between anthropological and mission theories and the efforts at educating the public.},

keywords = {Africa, applied anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{cocks_king_2000,

title = {The King and I: Bronislaw Malinowski, King Sobhuza II of Swaziland and the vision of culture change in Africa},

author = {Paul Cocks},

doi = {10.1177/09526950022120854},

issn = {0952-6951},

year  = {2000},

date = {2000-01-01},

journal = {History of the Human Sciences},

volume = {13},

number = {4},

pages = {25--47},

abstract = {Recent research into the life and work of Bronislaw Malinowski, one of the most important figures in British social anthropology in the 20th century, has concentrated upon his early life up to and including the years he spent in the Trobriand Islands undertaking his epoch-making fieldwork. However, very little of this research has been into the last decade of his life, especially his work on the impact of imperialism upon Africa’s colonized peoples. The purpose of this article is to extend this interest to his later research by contextualizing, describing and analysing Malinowski’s relationship with King Sobhuza II of Swaziland to whom he was introduced in 1934. I demonstrate that over the following four years, Malinowski sought to assist Sobhuza in regard to a number of matters, most notably his efforts to establish a national school linked to the Swazi age-grade system and his negotiations over the proposed transfer of Swaziland to the Union of South Africa. I argue that Malinowski gave this assistance because Sobhuza personified for him his vision of colonial and even postcolonial Africa which is contained in the largely ignored works of Freedom and Civilization and The Dynamics of Culture Change. Thus, these works reflect not only his background as a Pole in the Hapsburg empire, but also his contemporary experiences of colonial Africa.},

keywords = {Africa, applied anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{mosko_inalienable_2000,

title = {Inalienable Ethnography: Keeping-While-Giving and the Trobriand Case},

author = {Mark S Mosko},

doi = {10.2307/2661081},

issn = {1359-0987},

year  = {2000},

date = {2000-01-01},

journal = {The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute},

volume = {6},

number = {3},

pages = {377--396},

abstract = {In Inalienable possessions, Annette Weiner (1992) focuses on the paradox of `keeping-while-giving' rather than the `norm of reciprocity' as the central issue of social life, drawing heavily on Trobriand examples. In this article, key elements of Weiner's theory are contrasted with prevailing views of Melanesian personhood and agency and with canonical Western notions of exchange, and her use of the Trobriand materials is juxtaposed with previously published ethnographic accounts of the same practices. It is argued that Weiner's ethnographic illustrations do not lend support to her theory of inalienable possessions; that her conceptual framework is at considerable variance with well-founded understandings of Melanesian sociality; and that the paradox of keeping-while-giving is more appropriately seen as deriving from Western presuppositions of individual boundedness, subjectivity, possession, ownership, and hierarchy, and the need to establish permanence in an entropic world.},

keywords = {ethnography, Trobriands, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{hutnyk_cliffords_1998,

title = {Clifford's Ethnographica},

author = {John Hutnyk},

doi = {10.1177/0308275X9801800401},

issn = {0308-275X},

year  = {1998},

date = {1998-01-01},

journal = {Critique of Anthropology},

volume = {18},

number = {4},

pages = {339--378},

abstract = {■ James Clifford's work is discussed, in the first half of this article, through the prism of Malinowski, travel and the 'trinketization' of culture. In the second half, Clifford's 'ethnography' of the Fort Ross tourist-heritage project, and his sloppy reading of Marx, are brought in to contrast/comparison with Malinowskian perspectives to argue against the well-meaning pessimism of 'post exoticist' modes of culture commentary. The article is a polemical review of Clif ford's Routes (Clifford, 1997), demanding greater attention to the political context of anthropological work.},

keywords = {history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{bauer_review_1998,

title = {Review of The Story of a Marriage: The Letters of Bronislaw Malinowski and Elsie Masson, by Helena Wayne},

author = {Janet Bauer},

doi = {10.2307/645882},

issn = {0094-0496},

year  = {1998},

date = {1998-01-01},

journal = {American Ethnologist},

volume = {25},

number = {4},

pages = {769--771},

keywords = {book review, story of family, work about Malinowski, work about Masson},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{alvarez_conrad_1998,

title = {Conrad y Malinowski en el corazón de las tinieblas},

author = {Oscar Fernández Alvarez},

year  = {1998},

date = {1998-01-01},

journal = {Estudios Humanísticos: Filología. León : Facultad de Filosofía y Letras},

volume = {XX},

number = {20},

pages = {179--190},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{battaglia_ambiguating_1997,

title = {Ambiguating Agency: The Case of Malinowski's Ghost},

author = {Debbora Battaglia},

doi = {10.2307/681738},

issn = {0002-7294},

year  = {1997},

date = {1997-01-01},

journal = {American Anthropologist},

volume = {99},

number = {3},

pages = {505--510},

abstract = {Agency is useful to people not so much for controlling a site of authorship or authority as for ambiguating social relationships and authority. Both indigenous and anthropological practices of ambiguation are critical sites of discourse that allow the gaps and ruptures between epistemologies the possibility of positive value.},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{young_letters_1996,

title = {Letters},

author = {Michael W Young},

doi = {10.2307/2783410},

issn = {0268-540X},

year  = {1996},

date = {1996-01-01},

journal = {Anthropology Today},

volume = {12},

number = {6},

pages = {24--25},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{berman_ethnography_1996,

title = {Ethnography as Politics, Politics as Ethnography: Kenyatta, Malinowski, and the Making of Facing Mount Kenya},

author = {Bruce Berman},

doi = {10.2307/485804},

issn = {0008-3968},

year  = {1996},

date = {1996-01-01},

journal = {Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines},

volume = {30},

number = {3},

pages = {313--344},

abstract = {Dès son premier voyage en Grande Bretagne, en 1929, Jomo Kenyatta a suivi un chemin complexe, passant d'un groupe de patrons politiques et intellectuels à un autre, allant des missionnaires et impérialistes à tendance libérale aux communistes et autres éléments de la gauche britannique, s'acharnant à découvrir le moyen le plus efficace de représenter (de décrire et de défendre) les intérêts des Kikuyu, gens de sa tribu, auprès des autorités impériales. Sa quête de "l'argument irrévocable" semble avoir pris fin quand il a rencontré Bronislaw Malinowski et commencé des études d'anthropologie sociale à la London School of Economics. L'anthropologie fonctionnaliste a donné à Kenyatta le moyen de décrire le Kikuyu, en s'appuyant sur l'autorité de la science; les Kikuyu sont alors apparus comme une société homogène et intégrée, digne de recevoir le respect des Anglais et de faire entendre leurs griefs. Sa thèse a servi de fondement à Facing Mount Kenya, monographie classique, ouvrage politique autant qu'anthropologique. Dans cet ouvrage, Kenyatta a essayé sans succès de résoudre la contradiction entre sa description fonctionnaliste des Kikuyu, sa condamnation du colonialisme and sa défense d'un processus de modernisation conservatrice. Il reste cependant l'expression significative des dilemmes politiques, intellectuels, et personnels profonds des intellectuels africains pendant la période coloniale.},

keywords = {ethnography, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{bashkow_be_1996,

title = {To be his witness if that was ever necessary’: Raphael Burdo on Malinowski’s fieldwork and Trobriand ideas of conception},

author = {Ira Bashkow},

url = {http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1549&context=han},

year  = {1996},

date = {1996-01-01},

journal = {History of Anthropology, Newsletter},

volume = {XXIII},

number = {n.1 (June)},

pages = {pp. 3--11},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{lewis_malinowskis_1996,

title = {The Malinowskis' Letters},

author = {Herbert S Lewis},

editor = {Helena Wayne},

url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/2744426},

issn = {0011-3204},

year  = {1996},

date = {1996-01-01},

journal = {Current Anthropology},

volume = {37},

number = {5},

pages = {882--884},

keywords = {book review, work about Malinowski, work about Masson},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{dauber_bureaucratizing_1995,

title = {Bureaucratizing the Ethnographer's Magic},

author = {Kenneth Dauber},

doi = {10.2307/2744224},

issn = {0011-3204},

year  = {1995},

date = {1995-01-01},

journal = {Current Anthropology},

volume = {36},

number = {1},

pages = {75--95},

keywords = {ethnography, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{mosko_rethinking_1995,

title = {Rethinking Trobriand Chieftainship},

author = {Mark S Mosko},

doi = {10.2307/3034960},

issn = {1359-0987},

year  = {1995},

date = {1995-01-01},

journal = {The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute},

volume = {1},

number = {4},

pages = {763--785},

abstract = {This article develops a new perspective on Trobriand chieftainship and local leadership in light of recently developed theories of personhood, sociality and historical agency for the Pacific. The first section surveys the diverse and contradictory ways in which the Trobriand case has been incorporated in anthropological models of Pacific sociopolitical and taxonomic variation, historical change and evolution. The second section reinterprets classic and contemporary ethnographic accounts and posits that Trobriand leaders and chiefs, and the knowledge and agency on which they rely, have been constituted in historical times quite differently from the ways they have been ultimately represented in anthropologists' models. It is argued that chiefs and hamlet readers stand as metaphorical fathers to their constituencies; specifically that their agency is analogous to the `feeding' and `forming' contributions by fathers in procreation, infant care, the provision of food, the bestowal of magic, annual yam exchange (`urigubu') and mortuary de-conception, among other contexts.},

keywords = {Trobriands, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}