Bibliography

@article{Colajanni2022,

title = {Bronislaw Malinowski, practical anthropology, politics and colonialism},

author = {Antonino Colajanni},

url = {https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/5395},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.7340/anuac2239-625X-5395},

issn = {2239-625X},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-12-23},

journal = {ANUAC},

volume = {11},

number = {2},

pages = {3-66},

keywords = {colonialism, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Bassi2022,

title = {Comments on “Bronislaw Malinowski, l’antropologia pratica, la politica e il colonialismo” by Antonino Colajanni, with a response from the author},

author = {Marco Bassi, Valeria Ribeiro Corossacz, Antonio De Lauri, Frederico Delgado Rosa, Andrea E. Pia, Leonardo Piasere, Daniela Salvucci, Ivan Severi, Barbara Sorgoni, Jaro Stacul, Giuseppe Tateo, Elisabeth Tauber, Dorothy L. Zinn, Pier Paolo Viazzo, Antonino Colajanni},

url = {https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/5397},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.7340/anuac2239-625X-5397},

isbn = {2239-625X},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-12-23},

journal = {ANUAC},

volume = {11},

number = {2},

pages = {67-112},

keywords = {colonialism, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Salvucci2022b,

title = {Von Ozeanien nach Südtirol. Bronislaw Malinowski, der Vater der modernen Ethnographie, in Oberbozen},

author = {Salvucci, Daniela; Tauber, Elisabeth; Zinn, Dorothy L. },

url = {https://storiaeregione.eu/it/rivista/leggi/kloester-im-aufgeklaerten-staat-monasteri-nello-stato-illuminato},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-01},

journal = {Geschichte und Region/Storia e Regione },

volume = {31},

number = {1},

pages = {159-166},

keywords = {South Tyrol, work about Malinowski, work by Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Salvucci2022,

title = {Ambiti di relazionalità, storie di famiglia e rappresentazioni grafiche: i Malinowski in Alto Adige/Südtirol},

author = {Daniela Salvucci },

url = {https://doi.org/10.14672/ada20221969163-183 },

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-06-01},

journal = {Antropologia},

volume = {9},

number = {2},

pages = {163-183},

keywords = {work about Malinowski, work about Masson},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{young_helena_2018,

title = {Helena Paula Wayne Malinowska (1925–2018)},

author = {Michael W Young},

url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8322.12451},

doi = {10.1111/1467-8322.12451},

issn = {1467-8322},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-01-01},

journal = {Anthropology Today},

volume = {34},

number = {4},

pages = {26--27},

keywords = {biography, work about Malinowski, work about Masson},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{cook_malinowski_2017,

title = {Malinowski in Oaxaca: Implications of an unfinished project in economic anthropology, part I},

author = {Scott Cook},

doi = {10.1177/0308275X15615926},

issn = {0308-275X},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

journal = {Critique of Anthropology},

volume = {37},

number = {2},

pages = {132--159},

abstract = {Malinowski’s unpublished and long unavailable field notebooks from 1940 are examined to show how his fieldwork influenced the organization and content of the co-authored preliminary report (with Julio de la Fuente) of his unfinished Oaxaca Valley, Mexico project. The personal and diplomatic background of Malinowski’s Oaxaca project is reviewed, together with the origins and development of his views on economics before, during, and after his fieldwork in Melanesia. The reasons for the fitful nature of the handling of Malinowski’s Oaxaca project materials following his death in 1942 are explored, and the themes and content of his work on Trobriand economics are systematically compared with those of his work in Oaxaca. Implications of his incomplete Oaxaca project, and of other late-career writings, for his place in the history of economic anthropology are considered.},

keywords = {economics, Latin America, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{niehaus_anthropology_2017,

title = {Anthropology at the dawn of apartheid: Radcliffe-Brown and Malinowski’s South African engagements, 1919–1934},

author = {Isak Niehaus},

doi = {10.3167/fcl.2017.770109},

issn = {15585263},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

urldate = {2017-06-19},

journal = {Focaal},

volume = {2017},

number = {77},

pages = {103--117},

abstract = {In this article, I focus on different strategies of anthropological engagement with government and potential funders. I do so by considering the diverse nature of Alfred Radcliffe-Brown and Bronislaw Malinowski’s encounters with South African authorities, between 1919 and 1934. I suggest that Radcliffe-Brown saw South Africa as an integrated society in which segregation was impossible, and advocated the sympathetic scientific understanding of cultural difference within this context. By contrast, Malinowski was committed to a romantic vision of holistic cultures, collaborated directly with colonial authorities, and argued for a policy of effective cultural and territorial segregation. The strategies had important longterm consequences and costs, calculable only from the privileged vantage point of history.},

keywords = {Africa, history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{salvucci_segnalazioni._2017,

title = {Segnalazioni. MFEA – Il progetto Malinowski Forum per l’Etnografia e l’Antropologia},

author = {Daniela Salvucci},

url = {http://www.ethnorema.it/pdf/numero%2013/12%20Segnalazioni.pdf},

issn = {1826-8803},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

journal = {Ethnorêma},

volume = {13},

pages = {163--165},

keywords = {work about Malinowski, work about Masson},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{cook_malinowski_2016,

title = {Malinowski in Oaxaca: Implications of an Unfinished Project in Economic Anthropology, Part II},

author = {Scott Cook},

doi = {10.1177/0308275X16648750},

issn = {0308-275X},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

journal = {Critique of Anthropology},

keywords = {economics, Latin America, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{suolinna_focusing_2016,

title = {Focusing on fieldwork: Edvard Westermarck and Hilma Granqvist – before and after Bronislaw Malinowski},

author = {Kirsti Suolinna},

url = {https://ojs.abo.fi/ojs/index.php/scripta/article/view/461},

issn = {0582-3226, 0582-3226},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis},

volume = {17},

number = {2},

pages = {263--278},

abstract = {DOAJ is an online directory that indexes and provides access to quality open access, peer-reviewed journals.},

keywords = {ethnography, history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{milenkovic_james_2016,

title = {James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal Heterarchy},

author = {Miloš Milenković},

url = {https://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/265},

issn = {2334-8801},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology},

volume = {4},

number = {3},

pages = {17--29},

abstract = {Drawing on the explanation already offered for the confusion of positivism with realism in the epistemological imagination of the author and founder of postmodern anthropology, the paper analyzes the moral implications of dealing with problems characteristic of the philosophy of science by literary-theoretical means. The transdisciplinary migration of "realism" from literary theory to social science methodology has produced a whole new history of anthropology. The history of pre-postmodern anthropology constructed in this manner can be said to fit the register of some sort of comparative-cultural theory of retroactive moral judgement, complementing postmodern anthropology as a general theory of writing by political subjects, so that the theoretical-methodological dilemmas of postmodern anthropology do not constitute proof of the legitimacy of a holistic interpretation of the discipline’s founders’ intentions, but rather lead to neo-pyrrhonic, formalistic endeavours to uphold, by respecting academic trappings, the academic authority of the discipline whose subject, method and purpose, as a rule, even colleagues from adjacent departments for various reasons fail to understand. In the paper, evidence for this is derived from Clifford's writing of Malinowski, and the moral implications of the unfortunate analogy between the writing of political subjects and the writing of disciplinary founders are followed through. The paper then goes on to explain that the critique of the possibilities of misuse, particularly through political instrumentalization, of anthropological fictions as evidence of Others did not have to come at the cost of sacrificing the semblance of continuity in the establishment of anthropology as a proper academic discipline.},

keywords = {history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{cook_malinowski_2016-1,

title = {Malinowski, Herskovits, and the Controversy over Economics in Anthropology},

author = {Scott Cook and Michael W Young},

doi = {10.1215/00182702-3687295},

issn = {0018-2702, 1527-1919},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-22},

journal = {History of Political Economy},

volume = {48},

number = {4},

pages = {657--679},

abstract = {Bronislaw Malinowski and Melville Herskovits were founding contributors to the anthropological study of economic life—Malinowski as a pioneering ethnographer in Melanesia and a late-career ethnographer in Oaxaca, Mexico, and Herskovits as the leading exponent of comparative studies. The definition of their respective approaches to the study of economic life began in the 1940s with Karl Polanyi and in the 1950s with Raymond Firth, culminating in the formalist-substantivist debate of the 1960s–1970s. Malinowski's contribution was defined as emphasizing the institutional matrix of the economy while denying the universal applicability of classical/neoclassical economics; Herskovits's was defined as promoting the applicability of economics in comparative studies. A reconsideration of Herskovits's writings shows that his advocacy of the application of economics by anthropologists had qualifications and caveats. New documentary information about Malinowski's approach reinforces his commitment to the study of economic life as an ethnographic pursuit rather than a comparative one. It further reveals his late-career openness to the use of classical/neoclassical economic principles and concepts, his familiarity with market economics, and his views on the role of theory in ethnographic economics.},

keywords = {economics, ethnography, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{schneider_anthropology_2015,

title = {An anthropology of the sea voyage - Prolegomena to an epistemology of transoceanic travel},

author = {Arnd Schneider},

issn = {2413-9181, 2413-9181},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {Mobile Culture Studies. The Journal},

volume = {1},

pages = {31--52},

abstract = {DOAJ is an online directory that indexes and provides access to quality open access, peer-reviewed journals.},

keywords = {history, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{young_what_2015,

title = {What Did Malinowski Eat in Papua?},

author = {Michael W Young},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/19428200.2015.1058122},

doi = {10.1080/19428200.2015.1058122},

issn = {1942-8200},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

journal = {Anthropology Now},

volume = {7},

number = {2},

pages = {37--46},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{liep_trobriandization_2014,

title = {The Trobriandization of the Western World: Bronislaw Malinowski and the sexual revolution},

author = {John Liep},

url = {http://web.a.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=03553930&AN=102142033&h=zZFbcktcH5nZ1hiaoVsS527x307zh2epLMSLMWj065sRJ74ScmQ6jlDXcePcqteHD2XwfN2MY67%2f37V0rgZm6Q%3d%3d&crl=f&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d03553930%26AN%3d102142033},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-11},

keywords = {history, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{mosko_malinowski_2014,

title = {Malinowski magical puzzles: Towards a new theory of magic and procreation in Trobriand society},

author = {Mark S Mosko},

doi = {10.14318/hau4.1.001},

issn = {2049-1115},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-13},

journal = {HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory},

volume = {4},

number = {1},

pages = {1--47},

abstract = {Malinowski’s classic accounts of Trobriand sociality have left anthropology with many lasting conundrums. This two-part article examines two such puzzles revolving around contradictory reports over the agencies involved in magical chants (megwa). On the one hand, consistent with his pragmatic and functionalist theories of language and culture, Malinowski claimed that, although ancestral baloma and other spirits are typically invoked in most spells, those incantations’ efficaciousness derived instead from the power of the enunciated words. On the other, as part of his evidence in support of Islanders’ “ignorance of physiological paternity,” he conceded that spells intended to produce pregnancy in village women were instead expressly aimed at eliciting appropriate ritual actions from baloma spirits as agents of conception and birth. On the basis of ethnographic data recently gathered at Omarakana village interpreted through specific adaptations of the “New Melanesian Ethnography” and Tambiah’s earlier “participation” theory of ritual practice, I argue that for Trobrianders the magical power of words is the power of spirits, and vice versa. This insight has important implications for classic and contemporary debates over the nature of “magic,” controversies over paternity and so-called “virgin birth,” theories of personhood and agency, and the character of dala “matrilineage” relations.},

keywords = {kinship, magic and religion, Trobriands, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{lipset_savage_2014,

title = {Savage Memory: How Do We Remember Our Dead? Directed by Zachary Stuart and Kelly Thomson (review)},

author = {David Lipset},

doi = {10.1353/cp.2014.0028},

issn = {1527-9464},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {The Contemporary Pacific},

volume = {26},

number = {2},

pages = {583--585},

keywords = {movie review, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{bors_bronislaw_2014,

title = {Bronisław Malinowski: Deus ex machina of anthropology},

author = {Vanja Borš},

url = {http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/doaj/18483518/2014/00000004/00000001/art00002},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-01-01},

journal = {Holon},

volume = {4},

number = {1},

pages = {97--113},

abstract = {The purpose of this, popularizing, work is to look back and present fundamental, but also some lesser known, biographical information about the one of the most famous anthropologists, Bronisław Malinowski, and do so in the context of commemorating 130 years from his birth. Therefore, this work primarily traces his education, influences, research and educational activity. The essential contributions of Malinowski to anthropology, that is, his concept of functionalism and participant observation, are briefly presented as well.},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{alvarez_malinowski_2013,

title = {Malinowski and the New Humanism},

author = {Oscar Fernández Alvarez},

doi = {10.1177/0952695113480974},

issn = {0952-6951},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-01-01},

journal = {History of the Human Sciences},

volume = {26},

number = {2},

pages = {70--87},

abstract = {In this article Bronislaw Malinowski’s ideas on humanism are analysed with reference to unpublished texts and drafts, published texts such as A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term, his personal letters to his wife Elsie Masson and articles in which his ideals were reflected. An attempt will also be made to set Malinowski’s proposal for the New Humanism in its scientific and cultural context along with the work of other great thinkers and humanists of his day. Finally, it is suggested that Malinowski’s ideas in this field, despite the passage of time, are still relevant to social anthropology and, at the very least, still inspire new thoughts.},

keywords = {biography, history of anthropology, work about Malinowski, work about Masson},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{bartmanski_how_2012,

title = {How to become an iconic social thinker: The intellectual pursuits of Malinowski and Foucault},

author = {Dominik Bartmanski},

doi = {10.1177/1368431011423577},

issn = {1368-4310},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-01-01},

journal = {European Journal of Social Theory},

volume = {15},

number = {4},

pages = {427--453},

abstract = {The present article develops a new approach to intellectual history and sociology of knowledge. Its point of departure is to investigate the conditions under which social thinkers assume the iconic reputation. What does it take to become ‘a founding father’ of a humanistic discipline? How do social thinkers achieve the status of a trans-disciplinary star? Why some intellectuals attract tremendous attention and ‘go down in history’ despite personal and professional failures, while others enjoy only limited recognition or simply sink into oblivion, even if they have met all the standards of their day? Quite a few sociologists have tackled this elusive issue. Pierre Bourdieu, Michele Lamont and Randall Collins are among those who fleshed out strong explanatory frameworks. This project adds to this body of knowledge by emphasizing cultural factors that these authors downplayed in their seminal accounts, despite being aware of their significance. By showing why these underdeveloped aspects of their works need to be incorporated into the debate and how this can be achieved, this article introduces a new theorization of the iconic, lasting intellectual reputation substantiated by evidence from the lifeworks of Bronisław Malinowski and Michel Foucault. As such, it aims, minimally, to make sociology of knowledge decisively ‘cultural’. Maximally, it seeks to demonstrate that the iconic success of intellectual intervention in social theory depends on carefully performed and contingently mediated engagement with the binary systems of symbolic classification.},

keywords = {history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{corriveau_game_2012,

title = {Game theory and the kula},

author = {Louis Corriveau},

doi = {10.1177/1043463111434700},

issn = {1043-4631},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-01-01},

journal = {Rationality and Society},

volume = {24},

number = {1},

pages = {106--128},

abstract = {The paper expounds a non-cooperative game that can be interpreted as a model of the system of kula that was described by Bronislaw Malinowski in his Argonauts of the Western Pacific. The game of kula is an infinite-horizon game with an arbitrary, but fixed, number n of players. It generates pure norms of direct reciprocity, pure norms of indirect reciprocity, and mixed norms whereby a player who deviates is punished both by the individual who has been harmed and by a third party.},

keywords = {kula, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{meger_what_2012,

title = {What binds Bronisław Malinowski with social networks?},

author = {Zbigniew Meger},

issn = {2081-870X},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {EduAction : Electronic Education Magazine},

volume = {3},

number = {2},

pages = {27--32},

abstract = {DOAJ is an online directory that indexes and provides access to quality open access, peer-reviewed journals.},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{kuklick_personal_2011,

title = {Personal Equations: Reflections on the History of Fieldwork, with Special Reference to Sociocultural Anthropology},

author = {Henrika Kuklick},

doi = {10.1086/658655},

issn = {0021-1753},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-01},

journal = {Isis},

volume = {102},

number = {1},

pages = {1--33},

abstract = {ABSTRACT In the latter part of the nineteenth century, diverse sciences grounded in natural history made a virtue of field research that somehow tested scientists' endurance; disciplinary change derived from the premise that witnesses were made reliable by character-molding trials. The turn to the field was a function of structural transformations in various quarters, including (but hardly limited to) global politics, communications systems, and scientific institutions, and it conduced to biogeographical explanations, taxonomic schemes that admitted of heterogeneity, and affective research styles. Sociocultural anthropology, which took specialized shape at the beginning of the twentieth century, shared many properties with other field sciences, but its method—participant observation—was distinctive. Critical to the method's definition were the efforts of the British experimental psychologist-anthropologist W. H. R. Rivers, who relied on notions then widespread in Europe and the United States. The discipline's future mythic hero, Bronislaw Malinowski, embraced Rivers's model. For both men, proper fieldwork meant using the researcher's body as an instrument and entailed understanding both the anthropologist's body and the research subject's body as energy systems; this symmetry facilitated a relativist perspective. Participant observation remains central to sociocultural anthropology, but the discipline's pedagogic habits contributed to loss of memory of its energetic conceptualization.},

keywords = {ethnography, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{young_malinowski_2011,

title = {Malinowski last word on the anthropological approach to language},

author = {Michael W Young},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-01},

journal = {Pragmatics. International Pragmatics Association},

volume = {21},

number = {1},

pages = {1--22},

keywords = {linguistics, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{pels_global_2011,

title = {Global 'experts' and 'African' minds: Tanganyika anthropology as public and secret service, 1925-61},

author = {Peter Pels},

doi = {10.2307/41350755},

issn = {1359-0987},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-01},

journal = {The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute},

volume = {17},

number = {4},

pages = {788--810},

abstract = {Whereas many historians of British anthropology worried themselves about the complicity of anthropologists with colonial rule, and have tried to demonstrate a fundamental contradiction and gap between academic anthropologists and colonial administrators, a study of the professionalization of anthropology in Tanganyika Territory between 1930 and i960 can show that the ethnographic tradition of Tanganyika indirect rule slowly attuned itself to classical academic anthropology, just as classical academic anthropology increasingly adopted the agenda of indirect rule. The setting up of a Government Sociology department by the Tanganyika government after 1945 epitomized this rapprochement, but also reveals another, rarely studied, type of tension between academics and administrators: their different attitudes towards publicity and secrecy, both in relation to the international critics of the British colonial empire, and in relation to the African audiences that administrators, more than anthropologists, had to reckon with. Nombreux sont les historiens de l'anthropologie britannique qui se sont inquiété de la complicité des anthropologues avec la domination coloniale et ont tenté de mettre en lumière une contradiction fondamentale entre anthropologues académiques et administrateurs coloniaux. Une étude portant sur la professionnalisation de l'anthropologie dans le Territoire du Tanganyika entre 1930 et i960 montre pourtant que la tradition ethnographique du gouvernement indirect au Tanganyika s'est progressivement alignée sur l'anthropologie académique classique, en même temps que celle-ci se saisissait de plus en plus des thèmes du gouvernement indirect. La mise en place d'un département de Sociologie gouvernementale par le gouvernement du Tanganyika après 1945 marque l'apogée de ce rapprochement mais révèle en même temps un autre type de tension, rarement étudié, entre chercheurs et administrateurs : une attitude différente vis-à-vis de la publicité et du secret, qu'il s'agisse des critiques internationales de l'empire colonial britannique ou des relations avec les cercles d'opinion africains avec lesquels les administrateurs, bien plus que les anthropologues, devaient composer.},

keywords = {applied anthropology, history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{larson_did_2011,

title = {“Did He Ever Darn His Stockings?” Beatrice Blackwood and the Ethnographic Authority of Bronislaw Malinowski},

author = {Frances Larson},

url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2010.487869},

doi = {10.1080/02757206.2010.487869},

issn = {0275-7206},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-01},

journal = {History and Anthropology},

volume = {22},

number = {1},

pages = {75--92},

abstract = {Beatrice Blackwood (1889–1975) undertook fieldwork during a time of great change in British anthropology. This paper assesses the influence of Bronislaw Malinowksi on her research. Blackwood trained as a “generalist” at Oxford and worked in the anatomy department at the Oxford University Museum during the 1920s. My focus is on her 1929–1930 fieldwork in the Solomon Islands when she embarked on anthropological research in the intensive mode. Malinowski’s books, in particular, served to frame her expectations of herself as a successful fieldworker, but these expectations sat uncomfortably with her obligations to her Oxford superiors, Robert R. Marett, Arthur Thomson and Henry Balfour. This paper sets Blackwood’s aspirations in the field in the context of her education and work at the University of Oxford.},

keywords = {work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{vonarx_bronislaw_2010,

title = {De Bronislaw Malinowski à Virginia Henderson: révélation sur l'origine anthropologique d'un modèle de soins infirmiers},

author = {Nicolas Vonarx},

url = {http://journaldatabase.info/articles/bronislaw_malinowski_virginia.html},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-01-01},

urldate = {2017-08-14},

journal = {Aporia The nursing Journal},

volume = {2},

number = {4},

pages = {19--28},

keywords = {applied anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{matera_colonial_2010,

title = {Colonial Subjects: Black Intellectuals and the Development of Colonial Studies in Britain},

author = {Marc Matera},

doi = {10.2307/23265207},

issn = {0021-9371},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-01-01},

journal = {Journal of British Studies},

volume = {49},

number = {2},

pages = {388--418},

keywords = {history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{mosko_fractal_2009,

title = {The Fractal Yam: Botanical Imagery and Human Agency in the Trobriands},

author = {Mark S Mosko},

doi = {10.2307/40541749},

issn = {1359-0987},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-01-01},

journal = {The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute},

volume = {15},

number = {4},

pages = {679--700},

abstract = {Anthropologists have long appreciated that animals are 'good to think'. In this essay I ponder whether plants might be good to think too, and particularly whether there is any sense in asking if plants (along with animals) might also be 'good to act'. The botanical metaphor of 'base', 'body', and 'tip' animates the origin structures of many if not most societies of the Austronesian world. Less attention has been directed at indigenous elaborations in other socio-cultural domains of the region. Based on recent fieldwork, I outline such ramifications in Trobriand culture, drawing upon the notions of fractal recursion and self-similarity from chaos theory wherein emergent 'tips' yield 'fruit' which become the condition or 'base' for further production and transformation. Accordingly, the base-body-tip-fruit metaphor serves as a cultural template or scenario for social action, shedding new interpretative light on many topics of long-standing anthropological interest (e. g. yam propagation, display, and exchange, kula, mortuary celebration, age categories, fame) as well as more recent theoretical interests. /// Les anthropologues ont compris il y a longtemps déjà que les animaux sont "bons à penser". Dans cet essai, l'auteur se demande si les plantes sont elles aussi bonnes à penser, et en particulier s'il vaut la peine de se demander si les plantes (comme les animaux) pourraient être "bonnes à agir". La métaphore botanique de "base", "corps" et "tête" anime les structures originelles de beaucoup de sociétés du monde austronésien, sinon toutes. On s'est moins intéressé aux élaborations indigènes de la région dans d'autres domaines socioculturels. Sur la base d'un récent travail de terrain, l'auteur retrace ces ramifications dans la culture trobriandaise, utilisant les notions de récursivité fractale et d'autosimilitude de la théorie du chaos, selon lesquelles les "têtes" donnent des "fruits" qui deviennent la condition ou "base" d'une nouvelle production et transformation. En conséquence, la métaphore base-corps-tête-fruit sert de modèle culturel ou de scénario d'action sociale, jetant un nouvel éclairage interprétatif sur de nombreux sujets qui intéressent depuis longtemps les anthropologues (tels que la propagation, la présentation et l'échange des ignames, la kula, les célébrations mortuaires, les classes d'âge, la renommée), mais aussi sur de nouvelles questions théoriques plus récentes.},

keywords = {Trobriands, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{bell_materialising_2009,

title = {Materialising Oceania: New ethnographies of things in Melanesia and Polynesia},

author = {Joshua A Bell and Haidy Geismar},

doi = {10.1111/j.1757-6547.2009.00001.x},

issn = {1757-6547},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-01-01},

journal = {The Australian Journal of Anthropology},

volume = {20},

number = {1},

pages = {3--27},

abstract = {Oceania occupies an intriguing place within anthropology’s genealogy. In the introduction to this collection of essays, we examine the role of the ethnography of Oceania in the development of our anthropological perspectives on materialisation, the dynamic process by which persons and things are inter-related. Building upon the recent resurgence of theoretical interests in things we use the term materialisation (rather than material culture or materiality) to capture the vitality of the lived processes by which ideas of objectivity and subjectivity, persons and things, minds and bodies are entangled. Taking a processual view, we advocate for an Oceanic anthropology that continues to engage with things on the ground; that asks what strategies communities use to materialise their social relations, desires and values; and that recognises how these processes remain important tools for understanding historical and contemporary Oceanic societies. Examining these locally articulated processes and forms contributes to a material (re)turn for anthropology that clarifies how we, as scholars, think about things more widely.},

keywords = {ethnography, Melanesia, Polynesia, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{korta_malinowski_2008,

title = {Malinowski and pragmatics},

author = {Kepa Korta},

doi = {10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.006},

issn = {0378-2166},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Pragmatics},

volume = {40},

number = {10},

pages = {1645--1660},

abstract = {The aim of this paper is to study the grounds of Robert H. Robins’ claim (Robins, 1967, fourth edition) that much of contemporary pragmatics was anticipated by the great anthropologist and anthropological linguist called Bronislaw Malinowski. He describes Austin's work on speech acts as “following the steps of Malinowski in his dictum: ‘Speech is a mode of action, not a countersign of thought’.” We want to assess the force of that claim.},

keywords = {linguistics, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{kolankiewicz-lundberg_between_2008,

title = {Between Science and Life: A Comparison of the Fieldwork Experiences of Bronislaw Malinowski and Kirsten Hastrup},

author = {Marta Kolankiewicz-Lundberg},

url = {http://www.hpsfaa.org/Resources/Documents/Vol_28_No1_Spring_2008.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-01-01},

journal = {The Applied Anthropologist},

volume = {28},

number = {1},

pages = {76--88},

keywords = {ethnography, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{ziegler_what_2008,

title = {What makes the Kula go round?},

author = {Rolf Ziegler},

doi = {10.1016/j.socnet.2007.10.001},

issn = {0378-8733},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-01-01},

journal = {Social Networks},

volume = {30},

number = {2},

pages = {107--126},

abstract = {The Kula ring described by Bronislaw Malinowski is a system of the ceremonial exchange of gifts among a number of tribal societies inhabiting various island groups in the region east of Papua New Guinea. Two ceremonial gifts continually circulate in opposite directions: necklaces clockwise and armshells counterclockwise. After a brief description of the social system of Kula exchange, a game-theoretic interpretation of the ceremonial exchange as a signaling system for peaceful relationships among potentially hostile communities, with inbuilt checks against cheating, is given. A simulation model of the starting mechanism is presented to account for the emergence and stability of the observed pattern of circular exchange of the two ceremonial gifts. Distinguishing among different “historical” phases in the development leads to a decisive improvement of the model. The article closes with a discussion of the limits and future directions of research.},

keywords = {kula, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{frederiksen_jomo_2008,

title = {Jomo Kenyatta, Marie Bonaparte and Bronislaw Malinowski on Clitoridectomy and Female Sexuality},

author = {Bodil Folke Frederiksen},

url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/25472972},

issn = {1363-3554},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-01-01},

journal = {History Workshop Journal},

number = {65},

pages = {23--48},

keywords = {history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{burton_reflections_2007,

title = {Some Reflections on Anthropology's Missionary Positions},

author = {John W Burton and Orsolya Arva Burton},

doi = {10.2307/4622908},

issn = {1359-0987},

year  = {2007},

date = {2007-01-01},

journal = {The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute},

volume = {13},

number = {1},

pages = {209--217},

keywords = {history of anthropology, work about Malinowski},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}